James cannot afford a laptop and he finds it hard to write on his phone he said. Either that or he has limited ability to communicate. You are correct, he posts the same thing over and over again.
Roslyn lies to her 100 subscribers saying Hamas are resistance freedom fighters for Arab Palestinian people and further misstates that on Oct 7 Hamas only hit legitimate targets WTF in what deluded world does she live in and then says Israel has no right to exist ( blatant genocide anti semitism / anti Zionism ? Seriously
Just do confirm for completeness I think you have a comprehension problem as criticism of Israel is clearly NOT deemed anti semitism and nor should it ever be. I NEVER SAID IT WAS - That is absurd as so many Israelis do and should criticise Israel policies and their government including Netanyahu - eg removing court powers was wrong - disagreeing how to save hostages etc etc allowing Oct 7 to happen lack of Israel - there was wide agreement that Hamas must be dismantled and Israel having a right to defend itself - but avoiding killings which is difficult when Hamas militant terrorists is embedded in the infrastructure of civilian areas - hence the tragedy and delay all round. Clearly Hamas are not the freedom fighters as it had the opposite effect on any sane view
But anti Zionism in the context of Hamas and Hezbollah manifestos and radical left types radicals who call them resistance is a form of genocidal anti semitism - as it obviously they all seek the destruction of the Jewish nation homeland nation Zion state called Israel
For the avoidance of doubt i will repeat again-I clearly said criticism of Israel and it’s policies is clearly and obviously NOT anti semitic - almost all Israelis criticise their own democratically elected government and have varied views in the Jewish nation state- declared in 1947. I have never heard a mete critic of Israel called anti semitic ( if if they do it’s wrong and lie peddled by the radical left.
Now listen again if you want to understand further the big lie is being bandied around by college campuses by pro Hamas / pro Palestine supporters is to conflate is that they try to say - all we are doing is criticising Israel and when we do we are automatically called anti semitic ( which is the lie unto itself but if it’s true then it’s terrible ) of course you can criticise Israel policies - Israeli Jews people do themselves too including Netanyahu etc even within the Israeli cabinet there is criticism. That is legitimate
As Thomas Friedman NYT also said which is true “ criticising Israel is NOT anti semitic ( and saying so is vile ) BUT singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction ( through the years ) - out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East - is ANTI Semitic, and NOT saying so is dishonest.
BUT CLEARLY ANTI ZIONISM IS CLEARLY A FORM OF GENOCIDAL ANTI SEMITISM ( ANTI JEWISH PEOPLE WHO ARE ZIONISTS LIVING IN ISRAEL ( LIKE 7 MILLION OF THEM) THE MAJORITY OF JEWS ARE ZIONISTS. PERIOD..
Clearly ANTI Zionism in this context is clearly worse form of a NEW anti semitism as Douglas Murray and Natasha Hausdorff and others have also stated including Prof Cotler
Examples : These forms are when Israel has no right to exist and must be dismantled as the majority of Jews are Zionists and live in Israel is genocidal anti semitism . The public calls from mainly from the radical left or Maxist types and radical Islamists Jihadi - including Islamic terrorists calling for the destruction of the Jewish state Israel and Jewish people is clearly anti semitic - genocidal anti semitism.
The manifesto of Hamas and Hezbollah and Iranian regime calling for the destruction of the Jewish nation state sovereignty is another example of genocidal anti semitism ( anti zionsim ).
Religious Islamic Fatwas that call for the destruction of the Jewish state and its Jewish people.. ( a second Holocaust per say )
Political anti semitism ( anti Zionism )
The denial of the Jewish peoples right to self determination
The delegitimisation of Israel as Jewish nation state.
The attribution to Israel of all the worlds evils ( countless blood libels ) such as Israel is the poisoner of international wells.
Ideological anti semitism - including Zionism = racism rhetoric to Nazify Israel is reprehensible blood libel
Holocaust denial.
Racist/ prejudicial terrorism against Jews
Theological anti semitism - the convergence of Islamic anti semitism and Christian replacement theology, drawing a classical hatred of Jews.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena ( promoted by radical left groups and developed in origin Islamic cooperation countries within UN anti western countries who are the biggest human rights abusers like Syria / Lebanon and Iran being heads of members of Human rights council UN body - that absurdly single out Israel for differential treatment and discriminatory treatment in this arena - they appoint anti Western and pro dictatorship figured as human right experts is all anti Semitic ( anti Zionism ) yes
All of these above is clear examples new anti semitism ( anti Zionism) -prejudicial or bigotry towards the Jewish state
Whether one agrees or accepts each of of these sets of examples above there is littke doubt that the majority ( peddled by the radical left with some or many too ) must be included in any comprehensive Catologue of bigotry.
One doesn’t have to be a Zionist but if you are Anti Zionist that means you are against the Jewish people having a Jewish nation state homeland in its historical homeland ( settler colonialism state is another fallacy too - and it’s not hard to prove this with objective reasoning - this is peddled again by anti Zionists radical left bigots ( they believe it or some just like saying it and Islamists jihadi etc ) IS anti semitism anti Zionism
Again criticising violence by some extremists by both sides in Judea / West Bank that used to belong to Jordan after 48 is NOT anti semitic and many Israel’s condemn as do I … ( although doesn’t compare to Islamic jihadi terrorists who murder Palestinians ( who want peace with Israel ) and Jews alike and receive weapons from Iran smuggled via Jordan into the westbank ( area A - PA Administered ) and who seek the destruction of the sovereign Jewish state of Israel proper and restore it when an Islamic caliphate..( again genocidal anti semitism )
When East Jerusalem was taken, the Israeli authorities destroyed about one hundred Arab homes near the Wailing Wall to provide easy access for Jewish worshippers and a parking lot for tourists. In the Golan Heights and in some other areas unoccupied Arab homes have been crumbling down and indications are the crumbling has had considerable assistance from Israeli troops. This, too, may not contravene the Geneva Convention.
There are numerous types of punishment, which have been imposed by the Israelis on the civilian population, which are considered to be both collective punishments and reprisals. The Commissioner-General of UNRWA, in reference to Gaza, wrote: “The succession of incidents and security measures such as curfews, interrogations, detentions and, on some occasions, the demolition of houses which followed” were used to suppress, intimidate, and punish.
On November 2nd, 1968, many of the Arab shopkeepers in Occupied Jerusalem did not open their shops. The Israeli authorities regarded this as a strike and promptly confiscated fifteen shops owned by prominent Arabs. The New York Times described the matter: “Israeli officials confiscated fifteen Arab-owned shops in East Jerusalem today for what they described as security reasons.
“The seizures were said by the Israelis to have been necessary for billeting Israeli policemen who needed the strategic locations to maintain public order. The action was announced a few hours after the start of a strike by East Jerusalem shopkeepers and is regarded by many as an Israeli response.”
Mr. W.T. Mallison, Jr., Professor of Law at George Washington University and an expert in international law commented on this: “The action taken was clearly a reprisal directed at civilians and their property and therefore a violation of Article thirty-three.”
One of the most blatant abuses has been the transfer and deportation of civilian population. Article forty-nine forbids this: “Individual or mass forcible transfers as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the occupying power or to that of any other country occupied or not are prohibited, regardless of their motive. The occupying power shall not deport or transfer a part of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
These prohibitions were most definitely designed to make illegal the well-known Nazi practices of removing the “inferior” civilian population of an occupied territory to make room for the “superior” German population.
Mallison points out, “it should be noticed that the quoted provisions of Article forty-nine are flat prohibitions which are subject to no exception of any kind.” He goes on to say, “the individuals who are deported by the government of Israel in violation of the Convention are frequently leaders and notables. For example, a large number of the leading citizens of Jerusalem, Jordan, including its mayor, have been deported. The apparent purpose is to eliminate Arab leadership in the occupied territories and to make it more difficult for the remaining civilian population to protest against the oppressive and illegal measures to which they are subjected. Among the individual deportees are substantial numbers of school teachers. In Gaza, for example, the Commissioner-General of UNRWA has reported that forty-eight teachers have been deported.”
After getting rid of the civilian population, Israel has brought in its own settlers to the areas from which the Arabs have been expelled. In order to provide a technicality for justifying such movements, Israel has called the new settlements military settlements. They have established about fifteen settlements in the Golan Heights, and even one on the bank of the Dead Sea at Qumran.
Israel has established kibbutzim in Egypt’s Sinai, where their technicians are drilling for and pumping oil, and where an important tourist business is being developed. But the most flagrant breach of all is in East Jerusalem itself. By annexing instead of occupying East Jerusalem, Israel sought to provide a technicality for justifying its movement there and its treatment of Arab citizens. To the International Red Cross and, for that matter, to the whole world, this was completely unacceptable.
Article four states that: “Those who at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever find themselves in case of a conflict or occupying power of which they are not nationals are among the protected persons.”
In April 1970, the Israelis cordoned off a seven hundred and forty acre area at Hebron “for security reasons.” The Arabs protested—so did some Israelis—predicting that this would be another movement of Zionists into occupied territory. The Israeli military claimed it was for military purposes.
On May 21st 1970, the Jerusalem Post carried the following news item:
“JEWISH HOMES IN HEBRON TO GO UP IN 3 MONTHS”
“Israeli Deputy Premier Yigal Allon has said the first homes for Jewish families in Hebron on the occupied Jordan West Bank will go up in three months.
“Allon told members of the ruling labor alignment Tuesday that 250 housing units would be ready in Hebron—where the question of Jewish settlement has created considerable tension—before the end of 1911.
“He said the Israeli cabinet also had plans for the building of new homes for the present group of 140 Jewish settlers already established in the town.
“Plans to build an additional large Jewish urban quarter in the town, which has a population of some 40,000 Arabs, were still open, he added.
“Last month, Israeli military authorities cordoned off a 740-acre area near the town’s military government for security reasons amid Arab charges that the area would be used to settle Jewish families.”
Within Israel itself there is considerable embarrassment and protest against such flagrant violation of the Geneva Convention. Mr. Arie Eliav, secretary-general of Israel’s ruling labour party, Simha Flapan, and Meir Yaari, Mapam’s general secretary, all protest the reprisals, the proposed annexations, and destruction of Arab homes. And in an article in Le Monde, February 11th, 1970, Yaari outlined an eight point peace plan that began with this:
“Israel should put an immediate and unconditional end to the establishment of kibbutzim and civilian Jewish villages in the occupied territory.”
Arabs add up these things and cannot help but be impressed more with what Deputy Premier Allon says he is going to do and then does, than by what more flexible labour leaders say should be done.
Articles seventy-nine to one hundred and thirty-five provide a detailed code of conduct for the occupying power in its treatment of civilians who are interned. These articles were drawn up against the background of the infamous Nazi concentration camps, but often in Israel the treatment accorded internees seems more like what happened in some of the concentration camps than like what the Geneva diplomats hoped.
The Israeli government denies many of the charges made by both impartial observers and by the Arabs. However, the Tel Aviv government has refused to permit an impartial enquiry.
On March 3rd, 1969, the UN Human Rights Commission in Geneva adopted a resolution denouncing the Israeli rule in the Occupied Territories and established a special working group to investigate the alleged Israeli violations of the Civilians Convention. The government of Israel immediately announced that it would not co-operate with the UN group and their action was sufficient to frustrate any attempt at such an investigation. The numerous reports have been studied, of course, and the documentation is piling up.
It seems to me that if any other nation in the civilized world treated its occupants in this way, the whole world would be informed. Mr. Mallison says: “To the extent that the government of Israel fails to co-operate with authorized UN fact-finding agencies, its refusal justifies the invocation of further sanctions.” He say it is essential that the world public opinion be completely informed of the facts of the situation and the need for particular sanctions.
Then Roslyn attacks Israel on trying to degrade Hezbollah another Islamic death cult committed fo destruction of the Jewish state of Zion Israel
Zionism simply means a right to a Jewish nation state in its historical homeland ( British mandate of Palestine - had Jews, Arabs , Druze and Christian’s - so there was no Arab state per say
that belonged to a Palestine ) Jews lived there then other Jewish socialists bought plots of land from vacant Arab landowners who sold it for a profit on numerous occasions free will not theft
Roslyn lies to her 100 subscribers saying Hamas are resistance freedom fighters for Arab Palestinian people and further misstates that on Oct 7 Hamas only hit legitimate targets WTF in what deluded world does she live in and then says Israel has no right to exist ( blatant genocide anti semitism / anti Zionism ? Seriously
Just do confirm for completeness I think you have a comprehension problem as criticism of Israel is clearly NOT deemed anti semitism and nor should it ever be. I NEVER SAID IT WAS - That is absurd as so many Israelis do and should criticise Israel policies and their government including Netanyahu - eg removing court powers was wrong - disagreeing how to save hostages etc etc allowing Oct 7 to happen lack of Israel - there was wide agreement that Hamas must be dismantled and Israel having a right to defend itself - but avoiding killings which is difficult when Hamas militant terrorists is embedded in the infrastructure of civilian areas - hence the tragedy and delay all round. Clearly Hamas are not the freedom fighters as it had the opposite effect on any sane view
But anti Zionism in the context of Hamas and Hezbollah manifestos and radical left types radicals who call them resistance is a form of genocidal anti semitism - as it obviously they all seek the destruction of the Jewish nation homeland nation Zion state called Israel
For the avoidance of doubt i will repeat again-I clearly said criticism of Israel and it’s policies is clearly and obviously NOT anti semitic - almost all Israelis criticise their own democratically elected government and have varied views in the Jewish nation state- declared in 1947. I have never heard a mete critic of Israel called anti semitic ( if if they do it’s wrong and lie peddled by the radical left.
Now listen again if you want to understand further the big lie is being bandied around by college campuses by pro Hamas / pro Palestine supporters is to conflate is that they try to say - all we are doing is criticising Israel and when we do we are automatically called anti semitic ( which is the lie unto itself but if it’s true then it’s terrible ) of course you can criticise Israel policies - Israeli Jews people do themselves too including Netanyahu etc even within the Israeli cabinet there is criticism. That is legitimate
As Thomas Friedman NYT also said which is true “ criticising Israel is NOT anti semitic ( and saying so is vile ) BUT singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction ( through the years ) - out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East - is ANTI Semitic, and NOT saying so is dishonest.
BUT CLEARLY ANTI ZIONISM IS CLEARLY A FORM OF GENOCIDAL ANTI SEMITISM ( ANTI JEWISH PEOPLE WHO ARE ZIONISTS LIVING IN ISRAEL ( LIKE 7 MILLION OF THEM) THE MAJORITY OF JEWS ARE ZIONISTS. PERIOD..
Clearly ANTI Zionism in this context is clearly worse form of a NEW anti semitism as Douglas Murray and Natasha Hausdorff and others have also stated including Prof Cotler
Examples : These forms are when Israel has no right to exist and must be dismantled as the majority of Jews are Zionists and live in Israel is genocidal anti semitism . The public calls from mainly from the radical left or Maxist types and radical Islamists Jihadi - including Islamic terrorists calling for the destruction of the Jewish state Israel and Jewish people is clearly anti semitic - genocidal anti semitism.
The manifesto of Hamas and Hezbollah and Iranian regime calling for the destruction of the Jewish nation state sovereignty is another example of genocidal anti semitism ( anti zionsim ).
Religious Islamic Fatwas that call for the destruction of the Jewish state and its Jewish people.. ( a second Holocaust per say )
Political anti semitism ( anti Zionism )
The denial of the Jewish peoples right to self determination
The delegitimisation of Israel as Jewish nation state.
The attribution to Israel of all the worlds evils ( countless blood libels ) such as Israel is the poisoner of international wells.
Ideological anti semitism - including Zionism = racism rhetoric to Nazify Israel is reprehensible blood libel
Holocaust denial.
Racist/ prejudicial terrorism against Jews
Theological anti semitism - the convergence of Islamic anti semitism and Christian replacement theology, drawing a classical hatred of Jews.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena ( promoted by radical left groups and developed in origin Islamic cooperation countries within UN anti western countries who are the biggest human rights abusers like Syria / Lebanon and Iran being heads of members of Human rights council UN body - that absurdly single out Israel for differential treatment and discriminatory treatment in this arena - they appoint anti Western and pro dictatorship figured as human right experts is all anti Semitic ( anti Zionism ) yes
All of these above is clear examples new anti semitism ( anti Zionism) -prejudicial or bigotry towards the Jewish state
Whether one agrees or accepts each of of these sets of examples above there is littke doubt that the majority ( peddled by the radical left with some or many too ) must be included in any comprehensive Catologue of bigotry.
One doesn’t have to be a Zionist but if you are Anti Zionist that means you are against the Jewish people having a Jewish nation state homeland in its historical homeland ( settler colonialism state is another fallacy too - and it’s not hard to prove this with objective reasoning - this is peddled again by anti Zionists radical left bigots ( they believe it or some just like saying it and Islamists jihadi etc ) IS anti semitism anti Zionism
Again criticising violence by some extremists by both sides in Judea / West Bank that used to belong to Jordan after 48 is NOT anti semitic and many Israel’s condemn as do I … ( although doesn’t compare to Islamic jihadi terrorists who murder Palestinians ( who want peace with Israel ) and Jews alike and receive weapons from Iran smuggled via Jordan into the westbank ( area A - PA Administered ) and who seek the destruction of the sovereign Jewish state of Israel proper and restore it when an Islamic caliphate..( again genocidal anti semitism )
Hebron was a Jewish city btw and only 1100 Jews today - that sounds ethnic cleansing to me right back at you - the double standards is obvious
The nation with biggest Jewish population is Israel and are proud Zionists ( 7.2 million Jews in the Jewish state - followed by USA of over 5 M
I state this fact and you ridiculous try and absurdly conflate and twist facts
The whole western world accepts it now as a Jewish state for over 50 years now - advocacy
You repeat constantly disinformation and a fringe belief that israel is not even Jewish state and should not exist - that is hardly the push among western governments not now and not ever.
The disputed Palestinian territories outside Israel proper borders THAT CAN ONLY BE NEGOTIATED BY ISRAEL AND NON JIHADI MODERATE PALESTINIANS with land swaps a different story and we can endless debates about that ( sure the consensus has been for a two state solution and a future Palestinian seperate Arab state within the disputed territories that already partly have autonomy rule within a state of Israel which I and countless of Israelis and other Arab states believed should finally happen in for example 2000 that Arafat rejected after the most left wing Israel governments offered them 94 % of WB with land swaps and proceeded with Passover type massacres for 5 years ( - but cannot happen now with Islamic terrorism oh Oct 7 ) not your tripe nonsense that Israel shouldn’t exist at all - that’s hardly the mainstream push by sensible Westen government around the world only extreme radical left types like you and Islamist jihadi with manifesto to destroy Israel )
Alternatively there is some push to have a type of confederate confederation two nations within seperate state with a costs rica system again more autonomy with a PALESTINIAN Authority and UAE and Saudia arabia / Jordan helping to administer with Palestinian governing entity in area a and b and Gaza - Israel being more stable stronger state in the area helping security and ridding the place of Islamic jihadi extremists..
It is often said with some pride that Israel was the creation of the United Nations. It was the UN decision to partition Palestine of November 29th, 1947, that made the State of Israel possible. Thirty-three UN states voted for the partition; thirteen were opposed, and ten, including the United Kingdom, abstained. The majority was secured after remarkable lobbying and last minute pressure on doubtful states. This UN decision is referred to by many supporters of Israeli policies as the ultimate authority for Israel to proceed to declare itself a State.
It seems ironic that later unanimous decisions by the UN have been ignored. The General Assembly vote of 99-0 condemning the annexation of East Jerusalem and calling on Israel to “rescind all measures taken, and to desist forthwith from taking any action that would alter the state of Jerusalem,” on July 4th, 1967, was flouted. In late 1970 Israel is continuing to erect high rise apartments on Mount Scopus in East Jerusalem.
Ambassador Michael Cromay and other Israeli officials told me that there was no way by which Israel would give up any portion of Jerusalem. Israel has repeatedly declared she would not withdraw from Jerusalem. But the November 22nd, 1967, Security Council resolution includes as a condition of settlement the withdrawal of Israel from occupied territories. This was adopted 15-0.
In some ways Israel’s violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention for the protection of civilian persons are even more serious. It seems a strange paradox that Israel would refuse to abide by the conventions of international laws which were written as a direct result of the Nazi treatment of the Jews and other innocent people during World War II.
Following the war the Geneva Convention “relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war” was drawn up, and signed by most civilized nations, including Israel. The world vividly remembered the awful abuses carried out by both the Nazis in Germany and the Japanese in Asia. They were determined that such abuses would never occur again.
Four Conventions were approved: the first three concerned the protection of sick and wounded armed forces in the field, armed and shipwrecked naval forces, and the treatment of prisoners of war. Each of the Conventions was consistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. Israel signed the Conventions and has observed the first three. Whenever it has been to Israel’s interest to invoke the charter of the United Nations, or seek the security of international law, she has done so. When it has been in her interest to ignore the UN or flout the Charter, she has also done so—without hesitation and, so far, with impunity.
The blowing up of houses, the destruction of property, the individual or mass transfer of populations from occupied territory, are all expressly forbidden. Collective punishments and reprisals are forbidden. Yet books could be filled—in fact books are being filled—with accounts of incidents and records of Israeli breaches of the Convention.
For example, Article thirty-three states: “No protected person may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.”
I do not like to refer in any way to Israeli treatment of the Arabs as “Nazi,” but the parallels are so numerous and so similar that Arabs speak of Nazi tactics and practices frequently. The Israelis have relied upon a systematic destruction of homes and villages to suppress resistance.
Article fifty-three of the Fourth Convention says: “Any destruction by the occupying power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons or to the State or to other public authorities or to social or co-operative organizations is prohibited except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary for military purposes.”
On a main street in Gaza eight houses were blown up after a Jewish merchant was killed. There was no apparent attempt to apprehend the murderer. Reprisals were simply taken against the owners of the nearest homes. One of the owners was in Kuwait, another was an elderly woman. One can go down the list of the eight and the indications are that the victims were all innocent. This is typical. By mid-1970 something in excess of eight hundred homes had been individually destroyed and another seven thousand Arab homes had been brought down by the Israelis in one way or another. Red Cross observers told me that the Israelis have followed six different methods of destroying Arab homes, four of which blatantly contravene Article fifty-three. Two of the methods might be interpreted as militarily excusable.
The first contravention is the classical destruction of an Arab home as a punishment or reprisal. Israeli authorities acting on information or suspicion known only to themselves, move in, order the householders out, dynamite the home, and leave, forbidding the owner to rebuild.
Then there are collective reprisals, such as the destruction of the eight homes in Gaza. In the village of Hebron eighty such homes were destroyed. Ten Arab villages were razed and all homes destroyed—some, apparently as reprisals, some, according to the Israelis, for security reasons. One village, from which apparently Fateh could not be driven, was sprayed with liquid fuel and destroyed. This, according to the Red Cross and international observers, might be exempted from the general condemnation for military reasons under Article fifty-three.
Roslyn lies to her 100 subscribers saying Hamas are resistance freedom fighters for Arab Palestinian people and further misstates that on Oct 7 Hamas only hit legitimate targets WTF in what deluded world does she live in and then says Israel has no right to exist ( blatant genocide anti semitism / anti Zionism ? Seriously
Just do confirm for completeness I think you have a comprehension problem as criticism of Israel is clearly NOT deemed anti semitism and nor should it ever be. I NEVER SAID IT WAS - That is absurd as so many Israelis do and should criticise Israel policies and their government including Netanyahu - eg removing court powers was wrong - disagreeing how to save hostages etc etc allowing Oct 7 to happen lack of Israel - there was wide agreement that Hamas must be dismantled and Israel having a right to defend itself - but avoiding killings which is difficult when Hamas militant terrorists is embedded in the infrastructure of civilian areas - hence the tragedy and delay all round. Clearly Hamas are not the freedom fighters as it had the opposite effect on any sane view
But anti Zionism in the context of Hamas and Hezbollah manifestos and radical left types radicals who call them resistance is a form of genocidal anti semitism - as it obviously they all seek the destruction of the Jewish nation homeland nation Zion state called Israel
For the avoidance of doubt i will repeat again-I clearly said criticism of Israel and it’s policies is clearly and obviously NOT anti semitic - almost all Israelis criticise their own democratically elected government and have varied views in the Jewish nation state- declared in 1947. I have never heard a mete critic of Israel called anti semitic ( if if they do it’s wrong and lie peddled by the radical left.
Now listen again if you want to understand further the big lie is being bandied around by college campuses by pro Hamas / pro Palestine supporters is to conflate is that they try to say - all we are doing is criticising Israel and when we do we are automatically called anti semitic ( which is the lie unto itself but if it’s true then it’s terrible ) of course you can criticise Israel policies - Israeli Jews people do themselves too including Netanyahu etc even within the Israeli cabinet there is criticism. That is legitimate
As Thomas Friedman NYT also said which is true “ criticising Israel is NOT anti semitic ( and saying so is vile ) BUT singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction ( through the years ) - out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East - is ANTI Semitic, and NOT saying so is dishonest.
BUT CLEARLY ANTI ZIONISM IS CLEARLY A FORM OF GENOCIDAL ANTI SEMITISM ( ANTI JEWISH PEOPLE WHO ARE ZIONISTS LIVING IN ISRAEL ( LIKE 7 MILLION OF THEM) THE MAJORITY OF JEWS ARE ZIONISTS. PERIOD..
Clearly ANTI Zionism in this context is clearly worse form of a NEW anti semitism as Douglas Murray and Natasha Hausdorff and others have also stated including Prof Cotler
Examples : These forms are when Israel has no right to exist and must be dismantled as the majority of Jews are Zionists and live in Israel is genocidal anti semitism . The public calls from mainly from the radical left or Maxist types and radical Islamists Jihadi - including Islamic terrorists calling for the destruction of the Jewish state Israel and Jewish people is clearly anti semitic - genocidal anti semitism.
The manifesto of Hamas and Hezbollah and Iranian regime calling for the destruction of the Jewish nation state sovereignty is another example of genocidal anti semitism ( anti zionsim ).
Religious Islamic Fatwas that call for the destruction of the Jewish state and its Jewish people.. ( a second Holocaust per say )
Political anti semitism ( anti Zionism )
The denial of the Jewish peoples right to self determination
The delegitimisation of Israel as Jewish nation state.
The attribution to Israel of all the worlds evils ( countless blood libels ) such as Israel is the poisoner of international wells.
Ideological anti semitism - including Zionism = racism rhetoric to Nazify Israel is reprehensible blood libel
Holocaust denial.
Racist/ prejudicial terrorism against Jews
Theological anti semitism - the convergence of Islamic anti semitism and Christian replacement theology, drawing a classical hatred of Jews.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena ( promoted by radical left groups and developed in origin Islamic cooperation countries within UN anti western countries who are the biggest human rights abusers like Syria / Lebanon and Iran being heads of members of Human rights council UN body - that absurdly single out Israel for differential treatment and discriminatory treatment in this arena - they appoint anti Western and pro dictatorship figured as human right experts is all anti Semitic ( anti Zionism ) yes
All of these above is clear examples new anti semitism ( anti Zionism) -prejudicial or bigotry towards the Jewish state
Whether one agrees or accepts each of of these sets of examples above there is littke doubt that the majority ( peddled by the radical left with some or many too ) must be included in any comprehensive Catologue of bigotry.
One doesn’t have to be a Zionist but if you are Anti Zionist that means you are against the Jewish people having a Jewish nation state homeland in its historical homeland ( settler colonialism state is another fallacy too - and it’s not hard to prove this with objective reasoning - this is peddled again by anti Zionists radical left bigots ( they believe it or some just like saying it and Islamists jihadi etc ) IS anti semitism anti Zionism
Again criticising violence by some extremists by both sides in Judea / West Bank that used to belong to Jordan after 48 is NOT anti semitic and many Israel’s condemn as do I … ( although doesn’t compare to Islamic jihadi terrorists who murder Palestinians ( who want peace with Israel ) and Jews alike and receive weapons from Iran smuggled via Jordan into the westbank ( area A - PA Administered ) and who seek the destruction of the sovereign Jewish state of Israel proper and restore it when an Islamic caliphate..( again genocidal anti semitism )
Since most Jews do not live in what is called Israel, never did and never will and as you admitted without meaning to, many Israelis, non-Jews aside, are not real Jews because they reject the religion, most sensible people in the Western world do not recognise Israel as the Jewish State.
Remember, Israel claims to be THE Jewish state. There can be no other Jewish states so talking about A Jewish state is incorrect.
The nation with biggest Jewish population is Israel and are proud Zionists ( 7.2 million Jews in the Jewish state - followed by USA of over 5 M
I state this fact and you ridiculous try and absurdly conflate and twist facts
The whole western world accepts it now as a Jewish state for over 50 years now - advocacy
You repeat constantly disinformation and a fringe belief that israel is not even Jewish state and should not exist - that is hardly the push among western governments not now and not ever.
The disputed Palestinian territories outside Israel proper borders THAT CAN ONLY BE NEGOTIATED BY ISRAEL AND NON JIHADI MODERATE PALESTINIANS with land swaps a different story and we can endless debates about that ( sure the consensus has been for a two state solution and a future Palestinian seperate Arab state within the disputed territories that already partly have autonomy rule within a state of Israel which I and countless of Israelis and other Arab states believed should finally happen in for example 2000 that Arafat rejected after the most left wing Israel governments offered them 94 % of WB with land swaps and proceeded with Passover type massacres for 5 years ( - but cannot happen now with Islamic terrorism oh Oct 7 ) not your tripe nonsense that Israel shouldn’t exist at all - that’s hardly the mainstream push by sensible Westen government around the world only extreme radical left types like you and Islamist jihadi with manifesto to destroy Israel )
Alternatively there is some push to have a type of confederate confederation two nations within seperate state with a costs rica system again more autonomy with a PALESTINIAN Authority and UAE and Saudia arabia / Jordan helping to administer with Palestinian governing entity in area a and b and Gaza - Israel being more stable stronger state in the area helping security and ridding the place of Islamic jihadi extremists..
You repeat constantly disinformation and a fringe belief that israel is not even Jewish state and should not exist - that is hardly the push among western governments not now and not ever.
The disputed Palestinian territories outside Israel proper borders THAT CAN ONLY BE NEGOTIATED BY ISRAEL AND NON JIHADI MODERATE PALESTINIANS with land swaps a different story and we can endless debates about that ( sure the consensus has been for a two state solution and a future Palestinian seperate Arab state within the disputed territories that already partly have autonomy rule within a state of Israel which I and countless of Israelis and other Arab states believed should finally happen in for example 2000 that Arafat rejected after the most left wing Israel governments offered them 94 % of WB with land swaps and proceeded with Passover type massacres for 5 years ( - but cannot happen now with Islamic terrorism oh Oct 7 ) not your tripe nonsense that Israel shouldn’t exist at all - that’s hardly the mainstream push by sensible Westen government around the world only extreme radical left types like you and Islamist jihadi with manifesto to destroy Israel )
Alternatively there is some push to have a type of confederate confederation two nations within seperate state with a costs rica system again more autonomy with a PALESTINIAN Authority and UAE and Saudia arabia / Jordan helping to administer with Palestinian governing entity in area a and b and Gaza - Israel being more stable stronger state in the area helping security and ridding the place of Islamic jihadi extremists..
What you say is moot anyway Get your facts right please ROS as the majority of Jews who identify as Jews live in Israel as proud Zionists
15 million Jewish people in world and Israel has the largest Jewish population ( 7 plus million ) which makes sense for a Jewish state ( Jewish majority ethnic or otherwise followed by USA ( 5.7 m )
Ifs irrelevant whether you believe they are not Jews ethnic jews or not which is absurd as they are still identify as Jews in fact in culture / identify or a nation the Jewish nation in fact to them - THAT IS A FACT
1947 UN was a Jewish state partition - accepted by the Jewish people ( secular or religious or otherwise or as a start up nation of Jewish state ) Israel has exemplified all those things
I just send it for first time. But can you count ? I hope you can. Have a nice day
You're joking! I see the same post at least three times here.
James cannot afford a laptop and he finds it hard to write on his phone he said. Either that or he has limited ability to communicate. You are correct, he posts the same thing over and over again.
Roslyn lies to her 100 subscribers saying Hamas are resistance freedom fighters for Arab Palestinian people and further misstates that on Oct 7 Hamas only hit legitimate targets WTF in what deluded world does she live in and then says Israel has no right to exist ( blatant genocide anti semitism / anti Zionism ? Seriously
https://www.tiktok.com/@danielryanspaulding/video/7296515865472716064
https://youtu.be/KoJ0RsFW1eg?si=kTFO-7SStdBS9G2P
https://www.thinc-israel.org/articles/sovereignty-and-legitimacy-of-the-state-of-israel-under-international-law/
Just do confirm for completeness I think you have a comprehension problem as criticism of Israel is clearly NOT deemed anti semitism and nor should it ever be. I NEVER SAID IT WAS - That is absurd as so many Israelis do and should criticise Israel policies and their government including Netanyahu - eg removing court powers was wrong - disagreeing how to save hostages etc etc allowing Oct 7 to happen lack of Israel - there was wide agreement that Hamas must be dismantled and Israel having a right to defend itself - but avoiding killings which is difficult when Hamas militant terrorists is embedded in the infrastructure of civilian areas - hence the tragedy and delay all round. Clearly Hamas are not the freedom fighters as it had the opposite effect on any sane view
But anti Zionism in the context of Hamas and Hezbollah manifestos and radical left types radicals who call them resistance is a form of genocidal anti semitism - as it obviously they all seek the destruction of the Jewish nation homeland nation Zion state called Israel
For the avoidance of doubt i will repeat again-I clearly said criticism of Israel and it’s policies is clearly and obviously NOT anti semitic - almost all Israelis criticise their own democratically elected government and have varied views in the Jewish nation state- declared in 1947. I have never heard a mete critic of Israel called anti semitic ( if if they do it’s wrong and lie peddled by the radical left.
Now listen again if you want to understand further the big lie is being bandied around by college campuses by pro Hamas / pro Palestine supporters is to conflate is that they try to say - all we are doing is criticising Israel and when we do we are automatically called anti semitic ( which is the lie unto itself but if it’s true then it’s terrible ) of course you can criticise Israel policies - Israeli Jews people do themselves too including Netanyahu etc even within the Israeli cabinet there is criticism. That is legitimate
As Thomas Friedman NYT also said which is true “ criticising Israel is NOT anti semitic ( and saying so is vile ) BUT singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction ( through the years ) - out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East - is ANTI Semitic, and NOT saying so is dishonest.
BUT CLEARLY ANTI ZIONISM IS CLEARLY A FORM OF GENOCIDAL ANTI SEMITISM ( ANTI JEWISH PEOPLE WHO ARE ZIONISTS LIVING IN ISRAEL ( LIKE 7 MILLION OF THEM) THE MAJORITY OF JEWS ARE ZIONISTS. PERIOD..
Clearly ANTI Zionism in this context is clearly worse form of a NEW anti semitism as Douglas Murray and Natasha Hausdorff and others have also stated including Prof Cotler
Examples : These forms are when Israel has no right to exist and must be dismantled as the majority of Jews are Zionists and live in Israel is genocidal anti semitism . The public calls from mainly from the radical left or Maxist types and radical Islamists Jihadi - including Islamic terrorists calling for the destruction of the Jewish state Israel and Jewish people is clearly anti semitic - genocidal anti semitism.
The manifesto of Hamas and Hezbollah and Iranian regime calling for the destruction of the Jewish nation state sovereignty is another example of genocidal anti semitism ( anti zionsim ).
Religious Islamic Fatwas that call for the destruction of the Jewish state and its Jewish people.. ( a second Holocaust per say )
Political anti semitism ( anti Zionism )
The denial of the Jewish peoples right to self determination
The delegitimisation of Israel as Jewish nation state.
The attribution to Israel of all the worlds evils ( countless blood libels ) such as Israel is the poisoner of international wells.
Ideological anti semitism - including Zionism = racism rhetoric to Nazify Israel is reprehensible blood libel
Holocaust denial.
Racist/ prejudicial terrorism against Jews
Theological anti semitism - the convergence of Islamic anti semitism and Christian replacement theology, drawing a classical hatred of Jews.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena ( promoted by radical left groups and developed in origin Islamic cooperation countries within UN anti western countries who are the biggest human rights abusers like Syria / Lebanon and Iran being heads of members of Human rights council UN body - that absurdly single out Israel for differential treatment and discriminatory treatment in this arena - they appoint anti Western and pro dictatorship figured as human right experts is all anti Semitic ( anti Zionism ) yes
All of these above is clear examples new anti semitism ( anti Zionism) -prejudicial or bigotry towards the Jewish state
Whether one agrees or accepts each of of these sets of examples above there is littke doubt that the majority ( peddled by the radical left with some or many too ) must be included in any comprehensive Catologue of bigotry.
One doesn’t have to be a Zionist but if you are Anti Zionist that means you are against the Jewish people having a Jewish nation state homeland in its historical homeland ( settler colonialism state is another fallacy too - and it’s not hard to prove this with objective reasoning - this is peddled again by anti Zionists radical left bigots ( they believe it or some just like saying it and Islamists jihadi etc ) IS anti semitism anti Zionism
Again criticising violence by some extremists by both sides in Judea / West Bank that used to belong to Jordan after 48 is NOT anti semitic and many Israel’s condemn as do I … ( although doesn’t compare to Islamic jihadi terrorists who murder Palestinians ( who want peace with Israel ) and Jews alike and receive weapons from Iran smuggled via Jordan into the westbank ( area A - PA Administered ) and who seek the destruction of the sovereign Jewish state of Israel proper and restore it when an Islamic caliphate..( again genocidal anti semitism )
https://youtu.be/KoJ0RsFW1eg?si=bx7Ojltz0Bwqi9J0
No I’m not joking. I think I’ may post it 5 more times or my Jewish Zionist mother might post for me again. God bless her . I love my mother so much..
Part Two.Why Israel is illegal.
When East Jerusalem was taken, the Israeli authorities destroyed about one hundred Arab homes near the Wailing Wall to provide easy access for Jewish worshippers and a parking lot for tourists. In the Golan Heights and in some other areas unoccupied Arab homes have been crumbling down and indications are the crumbling has had considerable assistance from Israeli troops. This, too, may not contravene the Geneva Convention.
There are numerous types of punishment, which have been imposed by the Israelis on the civilian population, which are considered to be both collective punishments and reprisals. The Commissioner-General of UNRWA, in reference to Gaza, wrote: “The succession of incidents and security measures such as curfews, interrogations, detentions and, on some occasions, the demolition of houses which followed” were used to suppress, intimidate, and punish.
On November 2nd, 1968, many of the Arab shopkeepers in Occupied Jerusalem did not open their shops. The Israeli authorities regarded this as a strike and promptly confiscated fifteen shops owned by prominent Arabs. The New York Times described the matter: “Israeli officials confiscated fifteen Arab-owned shops in East Jerusalem today for what they described as security reasons.
“The seizures were said by the Israelis to have been necessary for billeting Israeli policemen who needed the strategic locations to maintain public order. The action was announced a few hours after the start of a strike by East Jerusalem shopkeepers and is regarded by many as an Israeli response.”
Mr. W.T. Mallison, Jr., Professor of Law at George Washington University and an expert in international law commented on this: “The action taken was clearly a reprisal directed at civilians and their property and therefore a violation of Article thirty-three.”
One of the most blatant abuses has been the transfer and deportation of civilian population. Article forty-nine forbids this: “Individual or mass forcible transfers as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the occupying power or to that of any other country occupied or not are prohibited, regardless of their motive. The occupying power shall not deport or transfer a part of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
These prohibitions were most definitely designed to make illegal the well-known Nazi practices of removing the “inferior” civilian population of an occupied territory to make room for the “superior” German population.
Mallison points out, “it should be noticed that the quoted provisions of Article forty-nine are flat prohibitions which are subject to no exception of any kind.” He goes on to say, “the individuals who are deported by the government of Israel in violation of the Convention are frequently leaders and notables. For example, a large number of the leading citizens of Jerusalem, Jordan, including its mayor, have been deported. The apparent purpose is to eliminate Arab leadership in the occupied territories and to make it more difficult for the remaining civilian population to protest against the oppressive and illegal measures to which they are subjected. Among the individual deportees are substantial numbers of school teachers. In Gaza, for example, the Commissioner-General of UNRWA has reported that forty-eight teachers have been deported.”
After getting rid of the civilian population, Israel has brought in its own settlers to the areas from which the Arabs have been expelled. In order to provide a technicality for justifying such movements, Israel has called the new settlements military settlements. They have established about fifteen settlements in the Golan Heights, and even one on the bank of the Dead Sea at Qumran.
Israel has established kibbutzim in Egypt’s Sinai, where their technicians are drilling for and pumping oil, and where an important tourist business is being developed. But the most flagrant breach of all is in East Jerusalem itself. By annexing instead of occupying East Jerusalem, Israel sought to provide a technicality for justifying its movement there and its treatment of Arab citizens. To the International Red Cross and, for that matter, to the whole world, this was completely unacceptable.
Article four states that: “Those who at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever find themselves in case of a conflict or occupying power of which they are not nationals are among the protected persons.”
In April 1970, the Israelis cordoned off a seven hundred and forty acre area at Hebron “for security reasons.” The Arabs protested—so did some Israelis—predicting that this would be another movement of Zionists into occupied territory. The Israeli military claimed it was for military purposes.
On May 21st 1970, the Jerusalem Post carried the following news item:
“JEWISH HOMES IN HEBRON TO GO UP IN 3 MONTHS”
“Israeli Deputy Premier Yigal Allon has said the first homes for Jewish families in Hebron on the occupied Jordan West Bank will go up in three months.
“Allon told members of the ruling labor alignment Tuesday that 250 housing units would be ready in Hebron—where the question of Jewish settlement has created considerable tension—before the end of 1911.
“He said the Israeli cabinet also had plans for the building of new homes for the present group of 140 Jewish settlers already established in the town.
“Plans to build an additional large Jewish urban quarter in the town, which has a population of some 40,000 Arabs, were still open, he added.
“Last month, Israeli military authorities cordoned off a 740-acre area near the town’s military government for security reasons amid Arab charges that the area would be used to settle Jewish families.”
Within Israel itself there is considerable embarrassment and protest against such flagrant violation of the Geneva Convention. Mr. Arie Eliav, secretary-general of Israel’s ruling labour party, Simha Flapan, and Meir Yaari, Mapam’s general secretary, all protest the reprisals, the proposed annexations, and destruction of Arab homes. And in an article in Le Monde, February 11th, 1970, Yaari outlined an eight point peace plan that began with this:
“Israel should put an immediate and unconditional end to the establishment of kibbutzim and civilian Jewish villages in the occupied territory.”
Arabs add up these things and cannot help but be impressed more with what Deputy Premier Allon says he is going to do and then does, than by what more flexible labour leaders say should be done.
Articles seventy-nine to one hundred and thirty-five provide a detailed code of conduct for the occupying power in its treatment of civilians who are interned. These articles were drawn up against the background of the infamous Nazi concentration camps, but often in Israel the treatment accorded internees seems more like what happened in some of the concentration camps than like what the Geneva diplomats hoped.
The Israeli government denies many of the charges made by both impartial observers and by the Arabs. However, the Tel Aviv government has refused to permit an impartial enquiry.
On March 3rd, 1969, the UN Human Rights Commission in Geneva adopted a resolution denouncing the Israeli rule in the Occupied Territories and established a special working group to investigate the alleged Israeli violations of the Civilians Convention. The government of Israel immediately announced that it would not co-operate with the UN group and their action was sufficient to frustrate any attempt at such an investigation. The numerous reports have been studied, of course, and the documentation is piling up.
It seems to me that if any other nation in the civilized world treated its occupants in this way, the whole world would be informed. Mr. Mallison says: “To the extent that the government of Israel fails to co-operate with authorized UN fact-finding agencies, its refusal justifies the invocation of further sanctions.” He say it is essential that the world public opinion be completely informed of the facts of the situation and the need for particular sanctions.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/09/david-martin/illegal-israel/
Why the radical left are anti Zionists hate Israel - the reality in history - bigotry
https://youtu.be/l-hrGiuTfvw?si=HLhfZApLxTWN_M3g
The 75 yo narrative Debunked
https://youtu.be/btVFgqkgkzw?si=rHZZQOTwyl2DzrYQ
https://youtu.be/btVFgqkgkzw?si=rHZZQOTwyl2DzrYQ
https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-law-of-exploding-pagers
Then Roslyn attacks Israel on trying to degrade Hezbollah another Islamic death cult committed fo destruction of the Jewish state of Zion Israel
Zionism simply means a right to a Jewish nation state in its historical homeland ( British mandate of Palestine - had Jews, Arabs , Druze and Christian’s - so there was no Arab state per say
that belonged to a Palestine ) Jews lived there then other Jewish socialists bought plots of land from vacant Arab landowners who sold it for a profit on numerous occasions free will not theft
https://www.thinc-israel.org/articles/sovereignty-and-legitimacy-of-the-state-of-israel-under-international-law/
Roslyn lies to her 100 subscribers saying Hamas are resistance freedom fighters for Arab Palestinian people and further misstates that on Oct 7 Hamas only hit legitimate targets WTF in what deluded world does she live in and then says Israel has no right to exist ( blatant genocide anti semitism / anti Zionism ? Seriously
https://www.tiktok.com/@danielryanspaulding/video/7296515865472716064
https://youtu.be/KoJ0RsFW1eg?si=kTFO-7SStdBS9G2P
https://www.thinc-israel.org/articles/sovereignty-and-legitimacy-of-the-state-of-israel-under-international-law/
Just do confirm for completeness I think you have a comprehension problem as criticism of Israel is clearly NOT deemed anti semitism and nor should it ever be. I NEVER SAID IT WAS - That is absurd as so many Israelis do and should criticise Israel policies and their government including Netanyahu - eg removing court powers was wrong - disagreeing how to save hostages etc etc allowing Oct 7 to happen lack of Israel - there was wide agreement that Hamas must be dismantled and Israel having a right to defend itself - but avoiding killings which is difficult when Hamas militant terrorists is embedded in the infrastructure of civilian areas - hence the tragedy and delay all round. Clearly Hamas are not the freedom fighters as it had the opposite effect on any sane view
But anti Zionism in the context of Hamas and Hezbollah manifestos and radical left types radicals who call them resistance is a form of genocidal anti semitism - as it obviously they all seek the destruction of the Jewish nation homeland nation Zion state called Israel
For the avoidance of doubt i will repeat again-I clearly said criticism of Israel and it’s policies is clearly and obviously NOT anti semitic - almost all Israelis criticise their own democratically elected government and have varied views in the Jewish nation state- declared in 1947. I have never heard a mete critic of Israel called anti semitic ( if if they do it’s wrong and lie peddled by the radical left.
Now listen again if you want to understand further the big lie is being bandied around by college campuses by pro Hamas / pro Palestine supporters is to conflate is that they try to say - all we are doing is criticising Israel and when we do we are automatically called anti semitic ( which is the lie unto itself but if it’s true then it’s terrible ) of course you can criticise Israel policies - Israeli Jews people do themselves too including Netanyahu etc even within the Israeli cabinet there is criticism. That is legitimate
As Thomas Friedman NYT also said which is true “ criticising Israel is NOT anti semitic ( and saying so is vile ) BUT singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction ( through the years ) - out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East - is ANTI Semitic, and NOT saying so is dishonest.
BUT CLEARLY ANTI ZIONISM IS CLEARLY A FORM OF GENOCIDAL ANTI SEMITISM ( ANTI JEWISH PEOPLE WHO ARE ZIONISTS LIVING IN ISRAEL ( LIKE 7 MILLION OF THEM) THE MAJORITY OF JEWS ARE ZIONISTS. PERIOD..
Clearly ANTI Zionism in this context is clearly worse form of a NEW anti semitism as Douglas Murray and Natasha Hausdorff and others have also stated including Prof Cotler
Examples : These forms are when Israel has no right to exist and must be dismantled as the majority of Jews are Zionists and live in Israel is genocidal anti semitism . The public calls from mainly from the radical left or Maxist types and radical Islamists Jihadi - including Islamic terrorists calling for the destruction of the Jewish state Israel and Jewish people is clearly anti semitic - genocidal anti semitism.
The manifesto of Hamas and Hezbollah and Iranian regime calling for the destruction of the Jewish nation state sovereignty is another example of genocidal anti semitism ( anti zionsim ).
Religious Islamic Fatwas that call for the destruction of the Jewish state and its Jewish people.. ( a second Holocaust per say )
Political anti semitism ( anti Zionism )
The denial of the Jewish peoples right to self determination
The delegitimisation of Israel as Jewish nation state.
The attribution to Israel of all the worlds evils ( countless blood libels ) such as Israel is the poisoner of international wells.
Ideological anti semitism - including Zionism = racism rhetoric to Nazify Israel is reprehensible blood libel
Holocaust denial.
Racist/ prejudicial terrorism against Jews
Theological anti semitism - the convergence of Islamic anti semitism and Christian replacement theology, drawing a classical hatred of Jews.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena ( promoted by radical left groups and developed in origin Islamic cooperation countries within UN anti western countries who are the biggest human rights abusers like Syria / Lebanon and Iran being heads of members of Human rights council UN body - that absurdly single out Israel for differential treatment and discriminatory treatment in this arena - they appoint anti Western and pro dictatorship figured as human right experts is all anti Semitic ( anti Zionism ) yes
All of these above is clear examples new anti semitism ( anti Zionism) -prejudicial or bigotry towards the Jewish state
Whether one agrees or accepts each of of these sets of examples above there is littke doubt that the majority ( peddled by the radical left with some or many too ) must be included in any comprehensive Catologue of bigotry.
One doesn’t have to be a Zionist but if you are Anti Zionist that means you are against the Jewish people having a Jewish nation state homeland in its historical homeland ( settler colonialism state is another fallacy too - and it’s not hard to prove this with objective reasoning - this is peddled again by anti Zionists radical left bigots ( they believe it or some just like saying it and Islamists jihadi etc ) IS anti semitism anti Zionism
Again criticising violence by some extremists by both sides in Judea / West Bank that used to belong to Jordan after 48 is NOT anti semitic and many Israel’s condemn as do I … ( although doesn’t compare to Islamic jihadi terrorists who murder Palestinians ( who want peace with Israel ) and Jews alike and receive weapons from Iran smuggled via Jordan into the westbank ( area A - PA Administered ) and who seek the destruction of the sovereign Jewish state of Israel proper and restore it when an Islamic caliphate..( again genocidal anti semitism )
When Jordan took Westbank they expelled Jews
Hebron was a Jewish city btw and only 1100 Jews today - that sounds ethnic cleansing to me right back at you - the double standards is obvious
The nation with biggest Jewish population is Israel and are proud Zionists ( 7.2 million Jews in the Jewish state - followed by USA of over 5 M
I state this fact and you ridiculous try and absurdly conflate and twist facts
The whole western world accepts it now as a Jewish state for over 50 years now - advocacy
You repeat constantly disinformation and a fringe belief that israel is not even Jewish state and should not exist - that is hardly the push among western governments not now and not ever.
The disputed Palestinian territories outside Israel proper borders THAT CAN ONLY BE NEGOTIATED BY ISRAEL AND NON JIHADI MODERATE PALESTINIANS with land swaps a different story and we can endless debates about that ( sure the consensus has been for a two state solution and a future Palestinian seperate Arab state within the disputed territories that already partly have autonomy rule within a state of Israel which I and countless of Israelis and other Arab states believed should finally happen in for example 2000 that Arafat rejected after the most left wing Israel governments offered them 94 % of WB with land swaps and proceeded with Passover type massacres for 5 years ( - but cannot happen now with Islamic terrorism oh Oct 7 ) not your tripe nonsense that Israel shouldn’t exist at all - that’s hardly the mainstream push by sensible Westen government around the world only extreme radical left types like you and Islamist jihadi with manifesto to destroy Israel )
Alternatively there is some push to have a type of confederate confederation two nations within seperate state with a costs rica system again more autonomy with a PALESTINIAN Authority and UAE and Saudia arabia / Jordan helping to administer with Palestinian governing entity in area a and b and Gaza - Israel being more stable stronger state in the area helping security and ridding the place of Islamic jihadi extremists..
Why Israel is illegal.
It is often said with some pride that Israel was the creation of the United Nations. It was the UN decision to partition Palestine of November 29th, 1947, that made the State of Israel possible. Thirty-three UN states voted for the partition; thirteen were opposed, and ten, including the United Kingdom, abstained. The majority was secured after remarkable lobbying and last minute pressure on doubtful states. This UN decision is referred to by many supporters of Israeli policies as the ultimate authority for Israel to proceed to declare itself a State.
It seems ironic that later unanimous decisions by the UN have been ignored. The General Assembly vote of 99-0 condemning the annexation of East Jerusalem and calling on Israel to “rescind all measures taken, and to desist forthwith from taking any action that would alter the state of Jerusalem,” on July 4th, 1967, was flouted. In late 1970 Israel is continuing to erect high rise apartments on Mount Scopus in East Jerusalem.
Ambassador Michael Cromay and other Israeli officials told me that there was no way by which Israel would give up any portion of Jerusalem. Israel has repeatedly declared she would not withdraw from Jerusalem. But the November 22nd, 1967, Security Council resolution includes as a condition of settlement the withdrawal of Israel from occupied territories. This was adopted 15-0.
In some ways Israel’s violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention for the protection of civilian persons are even more serious. It seems a strange paradox that Israel would refuse to abide by the conventions of international laws which were written as a direct result of the Nazi treatment of the Jews and other innocent people during World War II.
Following the war the Geneva Convention “relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war” was drawn up, and signed by most civilized nations, including Israel. The world vividly remembered the awful abuses carried out by both the Nazis in Germany and the Japanese in Asia. They were determined that such abuses would never occur again.
Four Conventions were approved: the first three concerned the protection of sick and wounded armed forces in the field, armed and shipwrecked naval forces, and the treatment of prisoners of war. Each of the Conventions was consistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. Israel signed the Conventions and has observed the first three. Whenever it has been to Israel’s interest to invoke the charter of the United Nations, or seek the security of international law, she has done so. When it has been in her interest to ignore the UN or flout the Charter, she has also done so—without hesitation and, so far, with impunity.
The blowing up of houses, the destruction of property, the individual or mass transfer of populations from occupied territory, are all expressly forbidden. Collective punishments and reprisals are forbidden. Yet books could be filled—in fact books are being filled—with accounts of incidents and records of Israeli breaches of the Convention.
For example, Article thirty-three states: “No protected person may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.”
I do not like to refer in any way to Israeli treatment of the Arabs as “Nazi,” but the parallels are so numerous and so similar that Arabs speak of Nazi tactics and practices frequently. The Israelis have relied upon a systematic destruction of homes and villages to suppress resistance.
Article fifty-three of the Fourth Convention says: “Any destruction by the occupying power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons or to the State or to other public authorities or to social or co-operative organizations is prohibited except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary for military purposes.”
On a main street in Gaza eight houses were blown up after a Jewish merchant was killed. There was no apparent attempt to apprehend the murderer. Reprisals were simply taken against the owners of the nearest homes. One of the owners was in Kuwait, another was an elderly woman. One can go down the list of the eight and the indications are that the victims were all innocent. This is typical. By mid-1970 something in excess of eight hundred homes had been individually destroyed and another seven thousand Arab homes had been brought down by the Israelis in one way or another. Red Cross observers told me that the Israelis have followed six different methods of destroying Arab homes, four of which blatantly contravene Article fifty-three. Two of the methods might be interpreted as militarily excusable.
The first contravention is the classical destruction of an Arab home as a punishment or reprisal. Israeli authorities acting on information or suspicion known only to themselves, move in, order the householders out, dynamite the home, and leave, forbidding the owner to rebuild.
Then there are collective reprisals, such as the destruction of the eight homes in Gaza. In the village of Hebron eighty such homes were destroyed. Ten Arab villages were razed and all homes destroyed—some, apparently as reprisals, some, according to the Israelis, for security reasons. One village, from which apparently Fateh could not be driven, was sprayed with liquid fuel and destroyed. This, according to the Red Cross and international observers, might be exempted from the general condemnation for military reasons under Article fifty-three.
More To come
Roslyn lies to her 100 subscribers saying Hamas are resistance freedom fighters for Arab Palestinian people and further misstates that on Oct 7 Hamas only hit legitimate targets WTF in what deluded world does she live in and then says Israel has no right to exist ( blatant genocide anti semitism / anti Zionism ? Seriously
https://www.tiktok.com/@danielryanspaulding/video/7296515865472716064
https://youtu.be/KoJ0RsFW1eg?si=kTFO-7SStdBS9G2P
https://www.thinc-israel.org/articles/sovereignty-and-legitimacy-of-the-state-of-israel-under-international-law/
Just do confirm for completeness I think you have a comprehension problem as criticism of Israel is clearly NOT deemed anti semitism and nor should it ever be. I NEVER SAID IT WAS - That is absurd as so many Israelis do and should criticise Israel policies and their government including Netanyahu - eg removing court powers was wrong - disagreeing how to save hostages etc etc allowing Oct 7 to happen lack of Israel - there was wide agreement that Hamas must be dismantled and Israel having a right to defend itself - but avoiding killings which is difficult when Hamas militant terrorists is embedded in the infrastructure of civilian areas - hence the tragedy and delay all round. Clearly Hamas are not the freedom fighters as it had the opposite effect on any sane view
But anti Zionism in the context of Hamas and Hezbollah manifestos and radical left types radicals who call them resistance is a form of genocidal anti semitism - as it obviously they all seek the destruction of the Jewish nation homeland nation Zion state called Israel
For the avoidance of doubt i will repeat again-I clearly said criticism of Israel and it’s policies is clearly and obviously NOT anti semitic - almost all Israelis criticise their own democratically elected government and have varied views in the Jewish nation state- declared in 1947. I have never heard a mete critic of Israel called anti semitic ( if if they do it’s wrong and lie peddled by the radical left.
Now listen again if you want to understand further the big lie is being bandied around by college campuses by pro Hamas / pro Palestine supporters is to conflate is that they try to say - all we are doing is criticising Israel and when we do we are automatically called anti semitic ( which is the lie unto itself but if it’s true then it’s terrible ) of course you can criticise Israel policies - Israeli Jews people do themselves too including Netanyahu etc even within the Israeli cabinet there is criticism. That is legitimate
As Thomas Friedman NYT also said which is true “ criticising Israel is NOT anti semitic ( and saying so is vile ) BUT singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction ( through the years ) - out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East - is ANTI Semitic, and NOT saying so is dishonest.
BUT CLEARLY ANTI ZIONISM IS CLEARLY A FORM OF GENOCIDAL ANTI SEMITISM ( ANTI JEWISH PEOPLE WHO ARE ZIONISTS LIVING IN ISRAEL ( LIKE 7 MILLION OF THEM) THE MAJORITY OF JEWS ARE ZIONISTS. PERIOD..
Clearly ANTI Zionism in this context is clearly worse form of a NEW anti semitism as Douglas Murray and Natasha Hausdorff and others have also stated including Prof Cotler
Examples : These forms are when Israel has no right to exist and must be dismantled as the majority of Jews are Zionists and live in Israel is genocidal anti semitism . The public calls from mainly from the radical left or Maxist types and radical Islamists Jihadi - including Islamic terrorists calling for the destruction of the Jewish state Israel and Jewish people is clearly anti semitic - genocidal anti semitism.
The manifesto of Hamas and Hezbollah and Iranian regime calling for the destruction of the Jewish nation state sovereignty is another example of genocidal anti semitism ( anti zionsim ).
Religious Islamic Fatwas that call for the destruction of the Jewish state and its Jewish people.. ( a second Holocaust per say )
Political anti semitism ( anti Zionism )
The denial of the Jewish peoples right to self determination
The delegitimisation of Israel as Jewish nation state.
The attribution to Israel of all the worlds evils ( countless blood libels ) such as Israel is the poisoner of international wells.
Ideological anti semitism - including Zionism = racism rhetoric to Nazify Israel is reprehensible blood libel
Holocaust denial.
Racist/ prejudicial terrorism against Jews
Theological anti semitism - the convergence of Islamic anti semitism and Christian replacement theology, drawing a classical hatred of Jews.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena ( promoted by radical left groups and developed in origin Islamic cooperation countries within UN anti western countries who are the biggest human rights abusers like Syria / Lebanon and Iran being heads of members of Human rights council UN body - that absurdly single out Israel for differential treatment and discriminatory treatment in this arena - they appoint anti Western and pro dictatorship figured as human right experts is all anti Semitic ( anti Zionism ) yes
All of these above is clear examples new anti semitism ( anti Zionism) -prejudicial or bigotry towards the Jewish state
Whether one agrees or accepts each of of these sets of examples above there is littke doubt that the majority ( peddled by the radical left with some or many too ) must be included in any comprehensive Catologue of bigotry.
One doesn’t have to be a Zionist but if you are Anti Zionist that means you are against the Jewish people having a Jewish nation state homeland in its historical homeland ( settler colonialism state is another fallacy too - and it’s not hard to prove this with objective reasoning - this is peddled again by anti Zionists radical left bigots ( they believe it or some just like saying it and Islamists jihadi etc ) IS anti semitism anti Zionism
Again criticising violence by some extremists by both sides in Judea / West Bank that used to belong to Jordan after 48 is NOT anti semitic and many Israel’s condemn as do I … ( although doesn’t compare to Islamic jihadi terrorists who murder Palestinians ( who want peace with Israel ) and Jews alike and receive weapons from Iran smuggled via Jordan into the westbank ( area A - PA Administered ) and who seek the destruction of the sovereign Jewish state of Israel proper and restore it when an Islamic caliphate..( again genocidal anti semitism )
https://www.tiktok.com/@danielryanspaulding/video/7296515865472716064
Israel exists and is recognised as a Jewish state by almost the whole western world
Breathe
Since most Jews do not live in what is called Israel, never did and never will and as you admitted without meaning to, many Israelis, non-Jews aside, are not real Jews because they reject the religion, most sensible people in the Western world do not recognise Israel as the Jewish State.
Remember, Israel claims to be THE Jewish state. There can be no other Jewish states so talking about A Jewish state is incorrect.
Roslyn praises Hamas as resistance freedom fighters for Palestinians and lies about Oct 7 says hamsas hit legitimate targets WTF - so messed up https://www.tiktok.com/@danielryanspaulding/video/7296515865472716064
The nation with biggest Jewish population is Israel and are proud Zionists ( 7.2 million Jews in the Jewish state - followed by USA of over 5 M
I state this fact and you ridiculous try and absurdly conflate and twist facts
The whole western world accepts it now as a Jewish state for over 50 years now - advocacy
You repeat constantly disinformation and a fringe belief that israel is not even Jewish state and should not exist - that is hardly the push among western governments not now and not ever.
The disputed Palestinian territories outside Israel proper borders THAT CAN ONLY BE NEGOTIATED BY ISRAEL AND NON JIHADI MODERATE PALESTINIANS with land swaps a different story and we can endless debates about that ( sure the consensus has been for a two state solution and a future Palestinian seperate Arab state within the disputed territories that already partly have autonomy rule within a state of Israel which I and countless of Israelis and other Arab states believed should finally happen in for example 2000 that Arafat rejected after the most left wing Israel governments offered them 94 % of WB with land swaps and proceeded with Passover type massacres for 5 years ( - but cannot happen now with Islamic terrorism oh Oct 7 ) not your tripe nonsense that Israel shouldn’t exist at all - that’s hardly the mainstream push by sensible Westen government around the world only extreme radical left types like you and Islamist jihadi with manifesto to destroy Israel )
Alternatively there is some push to have a type of confederate confederation two nations within seperate state with a costs rica system again more autonomy with a PALESTINIAN Authority and UAE and Saudia arabia / Jordan helping to administer with Palestinian governing entity in area a and b and Gaza - Israel being more stable stronger state in the area helping security and ridding the place of Islamic jihadi extremists..
You repeat constantly disinformation and a fringe belief that israel is not even Jewish state and should not exist - that is hardly the push among western governments not now and not ever.
The disputed Palestinian territories outside Israel proper borders THAT CAN ONLY BE NEGOTIATED BY ISRAEL AND NON JIHADI MODERATE PALESTINIANS with land swaps a different story and we can endless debates about that ( sure the consensus has been for a two state solution and a future Palestinian seperate Arab state within the disputed territories that already partly have autonomy rule within a state of Israel which I and countless of Israelis and other Arab states believed should finally happen in for example 2000 that Arafat rejected after the most left wing Israel governments offered them 94 % of WB with land swaps and proceeded with Passover type massacres for 5 years ( - but cannot happen now with Islamic terrorism oh Oct 7 ) not your tripe nonsense that Israel shouldn’t exist at all - that’s hardly the mainstream push by sensible Westen government around the world only extreme radical left types like you and Islamist jihadi with manifesto to destroy Israel )
Alternatively there is some push to have a type of confederate confederation two nations within seperate state with a costs rica system again more autonomy with a PALESTINIAN Authority and UAE and Saudia arabia / Jordan helping to administer with Palestinian governing entity in area a and b and Gaza - Israel being more stable stronger state in the area helping security and ridding the place of Islamic jihadi extremists..
What you say is moot anyway Get your facts right please ROS as the majority of Jews who identify as Jews live in Israel as proud Zionists
15 million Jewish people in world and Israel has the largest Jewish population ( 7 plus million ) which makes sense for a Jewish state ( Jewish majority ethnic or otherwise followed by USA ( 5.7 m )
Ifs irrelevant whether you believe they are not Jews ethnic jews or not which is absurd as they are still identify as Jews in fact in culture / identify or a nation the Jewish nation in fact to them - THAT IS A FACT
1947 UN was a Jewish state partition - accepted by the Jewish people ( secular or religious or otherwise or as a start up nation of Jewish state ) Israel has exemplified all those things